Legal Opinion
In Re Pilgrim's Pride Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas
Decided September 16, 2009No. 90-37213PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
D. MICHAEL LYNN, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the court is Debtors’ Omnibus Response To Section 503(b)(9) Claims (the “Response”) in which Debtors object to certain claims made under section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) (11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.) by trucking, electric, water, and gas companies. 1 In the Response, Debtors objected to the section 503(b)(9) 2 claims by trucking companies Stanley Freight, LLC (“Stanley”), S. Easley Trucking, Inc., and Chuck’s Transport, Inc. (collectively the “Trucking Companies”). Debtors also objected to the section 503(b)(9)…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gwendolyn Phillips v. Asset Acceptance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- GFI Wisconsin, Inc. v. Reedsburg Utility CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- In re NE Opco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- In re PMC Marketing Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013
- Hudson Energy Services, LLC v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (In re Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.