Legal Opinion

Nipper v. California Automobile Assigned Risk Plan

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1977No. S.F. 23494PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHARDSON, J.

This case presents the question whether an insurance broker and an association of insurers providing assigned risk automobile insurance to an allegedly unqualified or incompetent driver may be held civilly liable for personal injuries sustained by third persons as a result of the insured’s negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Under these circumstances we conclude that liability is unwarranted and will affirm judgments of dismissal.

Plaintiff was injured in January 1973 when the pickup truck he was driving collided with a car driven by the insured, H. K. Warkentin.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Scott v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Coulter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Nickelsberg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Braun v. Bureau of State AuditsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API