Legal Opinion
Neeley v. Board of Retirement
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1974No. Civ. 1741PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), J.
County of Fresno employees are covered by the provisions of the 1937 County Employees Retirement Law (Gov. Code, § 31450 et seq.), including, as of January 1, 1970, safety membership by certain persons employed by the sheriff’s office. Set forth in the margin are three sections of the Government Code germane to the determination of persons who fall in the category of safety members.
In addition to other distinctions from persons in the regular public service, an employee who is classified as a safety member is entitled to earlier eligibility for retirement (Gov. Code,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Huntington Beach v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Guardians of Turlock's Integrity v. Turlock City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Guelfi v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.