Legal Opinion
Riddell, Inc. v. Schutt Sports, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided July 14, 2010No. 08-cv-711-bbcPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In this civil action for monetary, declaratory and injunctive relief, plaintiff Riddell, Inc. has brought claims for patent infringement, false advertising under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and “trade libel and product disparagement” against defendant Schutt Sports, Inc. Defendant has brought the usual counterclaims for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity and inequitable conduct as well as counterclaims for false advertising under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and the Wisconsin Deceptive…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Hot Wax, Inc. v. Turtle Wax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Flir Systems, Inc. v. Sierra Media, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Dyson, Inc. v. Sharkninja Operating LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Sierra Media, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- In re Riddell Concussion Reduction LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.