Legal Opinion
Flir Systems, Inc. v. Sierra Media, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 9, 2012No. 3:10-cv-00971-HUPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HUBEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are four motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56(c): (1) defendant Fluke Corporation’s (“Fluke”) motion for summary judgment on its counterclaim for injunctive relief and damages for false advertising under Section 43(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946 (“Lanham Act”), 60 Stat. 441, as amended, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); (2) Fluke’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff FLIR Systems, Inc.’s (“FLIR”) claims for false advertising, trade libel/commercial disparagement, and civil…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Sierra Media, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- ITEX Corp. v. Global Links Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 2015
- Chaverri v. Platinum LED Lights LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Fortress Secure Solutions LLC v. AlarmSIM LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.