Legal Opinion

Schainman v. All Persons

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1929No. Docket No. 6495PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

These two actions to quiet title to the same piece of real property situated in the city and county of San Francisco were tried jointly by stipulation and the appeals in both are presented on a single typewritten record. The trial court gave judgment for the plaintiff in each case. Plaintiff claimed title under a tax deed issued to Paul Schainman on June 30, 1921, following a sale for nonpayment of taxes for the year 1915, and it is stipulated that the defendants are entitled to judgment unless their title has been divested by this deed. The main issues raised in these cases were considered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Edwards v. GrandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Jacoby v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Smith v. BiscailuzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Green v. De Los PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Smith v. AddiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Cafferkey v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Jackson v. HarrisNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Sipe v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API