Legal Opinion

Sipe v. McKenna

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 1951No. Civ. 18265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiff brought this suit to quiet title to a vacant parcel of realty.

On January 11, 1927, a bond was issued under the County Improvement Act of 1921 (Stats. 1921, p. 1658) which was a lien on the parcel involved. The County Improvement Act of 1921 adopted, as a part thereof, the Improvement Act of 1911, which is now sections 5000-6794 of the Streets and Highways Code. Defendant acquired title to the property on January 5, 1940. On November 4, 1946, the county treasurer, for the purpose of foreclosing the lien of the bond, sold the property to plaintiff for $551.40, and a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. Sonoma CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Barrett v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Schainman v. All PersonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKenna v. Elliott & Horne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Elbert, Ltd. v. McKennaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Miller v. BoswellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API