Legal Opinion

Cafferkey v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 8, 2015No. A140752PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

The City and County of San Francisco Office of the Assessor-Recorder (Assessor-Recorder) assesses taxable property within the county and records legal documents. (Gov. Code, § 27231; Rev. & Tax. Code, § 401.) The Assessor-Recorder maintains two different sets of maps in its office: (1) assessor’s maps or block book maps, which are used to locate and identify property for tax assessment purposes (assessor’s maps) and (2) subdivision maps or parcel maps, which are used to lease, sell, or finance property (parcel maps).

This appeal arises out of a dispute regarding the property…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Elk Hills Power v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Prudential Insurance of America v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. E. E. McCalla Co. v. SleeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. SHC Half Moon Bay, LLC v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jewish Community Centers Development Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. MTC Financial Inc. v. Cal. Dept. of Tax and Fee Admin.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. Hayward Property, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  4. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. v. Hayward Property, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API