Legal Opinion

State v. Ortiz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 2, 1975PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.

The defendant, Sam Ortiz, was charged with the crime of conspiring to sell heroin, in violation of §53a-48 of the General Statutes; 1 and, in part two of the information, he was charged with being a second offender. Part two was subsequently nolled. On a trial to the jury, the defendant was found guilty of conspiracy and was sentenced to a term of not less than five years nor more than ten years in the custody of the commissioner of correction. The defendant appealed to this court, alleging that the trial court erred in denying his motion to set aside the verdict, which the defendant claims…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MayellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. State v. BentonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. State v. RaffoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  4. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  5. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. PaduaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. GaynorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. State v. DeMatteoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API