Legal Opinion
State v. Mayell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 18, 1972PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The def endant was charged with (1) robbery with violence and (2) binding with intent to commit crime. A jury found him guilty of robbery with violence, but not guilty of binding with intent to commit crime. The court subsequently found him to be a second offender under the second part of the information, pursuant to §54-118 of the General Statutes. The defendant has appealed, assigning error in certain rulings on evidence and the court’s denial of his motions to dismiss and set aside the verdict.
The def endant’s attack on the court’s denial of Ms motion to set aside the verdict is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- State v. FerroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- United States v. Joseph Collon, United States of America v. John GarsideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Commonwealth v. LaCorteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.