Legal Opinion
United Technologies Corp./Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Division v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 10, 2002No. AC 21740PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHALAKOS, J.
In this gender discrimination case, the plaintiff employer, United Technologies Coiporation, Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Division (Pratt & Whitney), appeals from the judgment of the trial court, which dismissed Pratt & Whitney’s administrative appeal from an order and award by a hearing officer for the defendant commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) in favor of the defendant employee, Gale Nestor. On appeal, Pratt & Whitney claims that the court improperly (1) affirmed the commission’s clearly erroneous factual findings, and (2) concluded (a) that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Patricia SHUMWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Dennis James v. New York Racing Association, and New York State Racing & Wagering BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Cynthia J. Fisher, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Vassar College, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kelley v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Jones v. Dept. of Children & FamiliesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Recycling, Inc. v. Commissioner of Energy & Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining CommitteeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. WhitfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.