Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 24, 2003No. AC 23051PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The petitioner, David A. Friedman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, denying *528his petition for admission to the bar of Connecticut. The petitioner argues that the court improperly (1) denied his petition for admission to the bar, (2) remanded this matter two times to the respondent, the Connecticut bar examining committee, for additional factual findings and (3) failed to make a determination of his current fitness to practice law. We disagree with the petitioner, and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doe v. Connecticut Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. BotwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Somers v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Scott v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In Re Application of WarrenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Friedman v. Connecticut Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Disciplinary Counsel v. SpadoniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- In Re NashAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re NashAlaska Supreme Court · 2011