Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1947No. 34,266PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal in an action on a sales employment contract from a judgment entered upon a stipulated statement of facts.

For several years prior to July 1, 1941, plaintiff had been employed by defendant. On June 17, 1941, defendant sent plaintiff a letter reading in part as follows:

“Dear Sir:
“Effective as of July 1, 1941, * * * your annual compensation, in addition to your base salary of $200. per month will be determined as follows:
“ ‘A’ Net sales up to $50,000. per annum, no extra compensation.
“ ‘B’ Net sales between $50,000. and $60,000. per annum — 5% on $10,000. or any part…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leslie v. Minneapolis Teachers Retirement Fund Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Wilmot v. Minneapolis Automobile Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Mienes v. Lucker Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Geib v. Haynes CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Larsson v. Augustan a Colonization Ass'n of North America, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. The Telex Corporation v. D. E. BalchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Wick v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API