Legal Opinion

Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 12, 1996No. 95-5114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The government appeals from the March 16, 1995, decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims, No. 323-88 C, dismissing the government’s counterclaim for damages under the “no resale” clause of its timber contract with Hoskins Lumber Co. (Hoskins). The trial court denied the government’s motion for reconsideration on April 6, 1995, adhering to its earlier conclusion that it “did not have reliable testimony sufficient to understand how defendant was damaged, much less to guess an amount.” The appeal was submitted for decision after oral argument on April 4,1996. Because the “no resale”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  2. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of Agriculture v. Hobin Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  2. Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  4. Capital Development Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API