Legal Opinion

Capital Development Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 18, 2001No. 750-87CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

This action is part of a consolidated group of cases arising out of termination by the United States Forest Service (“Service”) of timber sales contracts in the Northwest during the 1980’s. Capital Development Company (“CDC”), along with other companies, brought actions under the Contract Disputes Act1 in an effort to have their non-performances of contract declared legally excused and to have the Service’s damages claims— here asserted as counterclaims — reduced or set aside. For the reasons which follow, the court finds that the government may recover on its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. AxmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Aragona Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  3. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of Agriculture v. Hobin Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seaboard Lumber Company and Capital Development Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Conservation Congress v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API