Legal Opinion
Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 5, 1994No. 92-5091, 92-5108PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc. (Hoskins) and the United States Forest Service (Forest Service) cross appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims’ decision that Hos-kins defaulted on its timber contract. Hoskins Lumber Co. v. United States, 24 Cl.Ct. 259 (1991). This court affirms the decision of the Court of Federal Claims on default. Following the default, the Forest Service dedicated the area covered by the contract as protected habitat for the Northern Spotted Owl. Because the Government did not resell this timber, the trial court declined to award damages…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Latrobe Steel Co. v. United Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Transamerica Insurance Corporation, Inc., for and on Behalf of Stroup Sheet Metal Works v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- North Side Lumber Co. v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- B. D. Click Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bauer v. ShepardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Cyrix Corporation, and Sgs-Thomson Microelectronics, Inc., and International Business MacHines Corporation v. Intel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Hoskins Lumber Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Rosboro Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.