Legal Opinion

Daniel A. Doody v. John Sexton & Company

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 27, 1969No. 7233_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, John Sexton & Co., a merchandising company having head offices in Chicago, and doing business in a number of states, employed plaintiff Doody in its Boston office. Taking the evidence as it developed in the district court most favorable to the plaintiff, at a conference in Chicago two of defendant’s officers promised plaintiff lifetime employment in defendant’s Los Angeles office if he would move to California. Plaintiff did move, but found himself out of phase with the manager there, who placed substantially different conditions upon his employment than,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Barrett Associates, Inc. v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  3. Sampson v. ChannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  4. Gage v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Yerid v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. Paul I. Murphy v. Erwin-Wasey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. Eby v. York-Division, Borg-WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
  5. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Boston, Massachusetts on July 31, 1973District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API