Sampson v. Channell
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.
On this appeal the question presented may be stated simply, but the answer is not free from difficulty. A car driven by defendant’s testator collided in Maine with a car driven by the plaintiff, injuring both the plaintiff and his wife, who was a passenger. The wife sued and recovered, judgment. We affirmed that judgment in Channell v. Sampson, Dec. 29, 1939, Cir., 108 F.2d 315. In this, the husband’s action, 'the jury found specially that the plaintiff’s injury was caused by the negligence of defendant’s testator, but brought in a general verdict for the defendant on…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.