Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. James

1. Under the ruling of this court when the case was here on a former occasion, the question as to the ability of the child to render services of value was for decision by the' jury. The trial judge properly excluded testimony stating the opinion of certain witnesses, to the effect that a child of similar age, and mental and physical development, to the plaintiff’s child ryas incapable of rendering services of value.(a) The testimony referred to in the preceding note was introduced by the defendant without objection, and the opposing counsel proceeded to cross-examine the witnesses relatively…