Legal Opinion

Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Sarman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 28, 1928No. 18442PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The fact that an automobile which, while crossing a railroad-track at a public crossing was run into by an approaching train, would, if it had not stalled upon the track, have passed over the track in safety, does not, where there is evidence that the train was running at a rate of speed that was in fact negligent at the time and place and under the circumstances, and that the crossing whistle was not blown as required by law, establish as a fact that the stalling of the automobile, and not some act of negligence on the part of the railroad company, was the proximate cause of the injury.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Americus, Preston & Lumpkin Railroad v. LuckieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. SlatonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  2. Jordan v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Collins v. McPhersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Reliance Insurance v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. City Ice Delivery Co. v. TurleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API