Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Studdard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. In Jarrell v. Seaboard Air-Line Ry., 21 Ga. App. 415 (2) (94 S. E. 648), this court said, that “it is clear that the decision of the Supreme Court [in Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. Jarrell, 145 Ga. 688, 89 S. E. 718) was distinctly predicated upon the fact 'that there was uneontradieted evidence that the two engines which passed shortly *571before the fire was discovered were properly equipped with sparkarresters, wherefore the circumstantial evidence - offered to show that the fire was caused by sparks emitted from an engine of the defendant company was not sufficient to ‘reasonably establish the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Davis v. WhitcombCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Augusta Factory v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
- Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. v. KovatchOhio Supreme Court · 1929
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.