Huenergardt v. Huenergardt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWood, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from an order (1) denying her motion for an order compelling defendant to answer certain questions which were asked during the taking of his deposition, and (2) requiring her attorney to pay $100 to defendant as attorney’s fees incurred in opposing the motion.
In 1949 plaintiff (wife) was awarded custody of the minor daughter of the parties in a final judgment of divorce. In June 1961 defendant (husband) obtained an order requiring plaintiff to show cause why custody of the daughter should not be awarded to him. On December 15, 1961, while plaintiff was taking the deposition…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carlson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- San Diego Professional Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Southern Pacific Co. v. OppenheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Filipoff v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Farnham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tsafaroff v. Taylor (In re Taylor)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Lund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Little v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Tad Imuta v. Takaaki NakanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Slemaker v. WoolleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.