Filipoff v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Phill Silver, in pro. per., for Real Parties in Interest.
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Petitioner Filipoff (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) seeks mandate to compel the respondent court to vacate one order and to make another in connection with certain 'discovery procedures.
Petitioner sued KTTV, Inc. (the owner and operator of radio station KTTV), and George Putnam (a broadcaster who with his attorney Phill Silver are the real parties in interest herein) for libel, based on certain statements made in discussing petitioner’s activities in conducting the affairs of a trade union of which petitioner was an oficial. As one of his affirmative defenses Putnam pleaded…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Twin Lock, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3Cited by13 opinions
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Shively v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Associated Brewers Distributing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Rio Grande Gas Company v. GilbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.