Moore v. Indian Spring Channel Gold Mining Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff upon his own claim and certain claims assigned to him by his fellow-laborers, for work performed by them as miners.
The .court found in favor of the plaintiff on his own and the assigned claims and “that defendant Charles Mushrush promised to pay each of said above-named persons at the rate of three and 50/100 dollars a day wages for eight hours work,” no part of which has “ever been paid to either or any of said named persons.”
The action was to recover not only the wages of the men, hut also the penalty as provided by the act entitled, “An act providing…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & St. Paul Railway Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. PaulSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Kerr's Catering Service v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Triad Data Services, Inc. v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.