Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 2, 2012No. 59, September Term, 2011PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

Montgomery County law enforcement officers, situated at a “listening post” in Montgomery County, Maryland, and operating under an ex parte order issued by a judge of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County properly under the Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act, intercepted a *214mobile phone communication from a target mobile phone, caller, and receiver located in Virginia. Section 10 — 408(c) of the Maryland Code, Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, permits a Maryland judge to enter an ex parte order authorizing the interception of “wire, oral, or electronic communications…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. KahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Kadoranian v. Bellingham Police DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Building Materials Corp. of America v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Baker v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. State of Delaware v. Jermaine BrinkleySuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
  5. State v. Edward Ronald Ates (070926)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API