State of Delaware v. Jermaine Brinkley

OPINION

WITHAM, R.J.

Defendant Jermaine Brinkley' (“Brinkley”) requests this Court grant' reargument on his motion to suppress wiretap evidence. Brinkley claims the Court did not consider all grounds asserted in the motion. Specifically, Brinkley requests the Court reconsider its decision based on his challenge to the territorial jurisdiction of the wiretap order and the denial of an evidentiary hearing. -

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In November 2015, this Court denied Brinkley’s motion to suppress evidence derived from a wiretap order. Brinkley ar gued that the wiretap order authorized law…