Legal Opinion
Longshore v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 8, 2007No. 139 September Term, 2004PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, Chief Judge.
In Terry v. Ohio, the Supreme Court held that a police officer may stop and detain a person briefly for investigative purposes if the officer has a reasonable suspicion, supported by articulable facts, that criminal activity “may be afoot.” 392 U.S. 1, 30, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1884, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 911 (1968); see also Quince v. State, 319 Md. 430, 433, 572 A.2d 1086, 1087-1088 (1990), Anderson v. State, 282 Md. 701, 706, 387 A.2d 281, 284 (1978) (“[T]he real thrust of Terry is directed at instances in which there is reasonable suspicion that someone is about to commit or has just…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- People v. PollardColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. Science Applications International Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.