Heath v. Manson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action is against defendants constituting the board of public works of the city and county of 'San Francisco, and the sureties upon their official bonds, for damages caused by a personal injury suffered by plaintiff in stumbling and falling over a sidewalk in the city which was out of repair and in a dangerous condition. The action is predicated upon the’ duty of the board of public works to maintain the sidewalks of the city in a reasonably safe condition, and upon their negligent failure so to do in this instance. The liability of the defendants in a proper case is not questioned, but…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Evanston v. GunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Furnell v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
- City of New Albany v. McCullochIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Shaw v. President of the Sun PrairieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Grundel v. Union Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Orange County Water District v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Keiper v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Bertolozzi v. Progressive Concrete Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.