Legal Opinion
Keiper v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 1918No. Civ. No. 1784PublishedCited by 20 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for three thousand five hundred dollars against the defendant, Elkus, but not against the defendant, Pacific Gas & Electric Company. Judgment was entered accordingly, from which defendant Elkus appeals.
The evidence discloses that the accident and the injury complained of occurred substantially as set forth in the complaint, as follows:
“That about the hour of 9 o’clock A. M. on said sixth day of December, 1913, said defendant Albert Elkus, without any cause or reason for so doing, other than…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Barrett v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Doeg v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Pastene v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
- Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Springer v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- State v. Wash., B. A.R. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.