In re Honeywell, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Honeywell Incorporated appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 169 USPQ 619, refusing *1345registration of a configuration of a portion of a thermostat, as a trademark for thermostats, on the Principal Register,
The application,1 alleging use since 1952, seeks registration of the following:
A smooth outer cover ring, or “decorator ring,” and a center disc positioned concentrically therein are depicted. These features were a portion of the subject matter of an expired design patent2 which the appellant had owned.
The trademark examiner had refused registration…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Midwest Industries, Inc. v. Karavan Trailers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Kohler Co. v. Moen Incorporated, F/k/a Stanadyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. Duracraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.