Legal Opinion
In Re Tucker
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 4, 1932No. Patent Appeal 2552PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
On January 21, 1931, this court, in Re Oliver M. Tucker and William A. Reeves, 46 F.(2d) 214, 18 C. C. P. A. 875, affirmed the action of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office in its rejection of appellants’ claims X, 12, 45, and 46, which were intended to cover shear structure for glass machinery. Claim 12 is illustrative, we think, iand reads: “12. A shear structure comprising a pair of shears movable into overlapping relation, and means for simultaneously adjusting the shears to vary their degree of .overlap while in operation.”
Appellants’ claims in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smart v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Dean v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914
- Blythe Co. v. HinckleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Evans v. Suess Ornamental Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- In re TuckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Fageol v. MidboeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
- In Re RidgwayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Application of BeltzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.