Legal Opinion

In Re Boyce

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 26, 1944No. Patent Appeal 4914PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner rejecting three claims numbered 9, 10, and 11, embraced in a divisional application for patent for “Armature Assembling Machines.”

Claim 9 reads as follows:

“9. In a coil positioning machine for an armature assembly including a slotted core to receive the side portions of the armature coils, rotatable means for exerting a preliminary inserting pressure upon groups of adjacent coil sides, prior to application of full inserting pressure…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. In re WagenhorstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  2. In re LincolnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  3. In Re EllisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  4. Crane v. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  5. Foss v. OglesbyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Application of Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. In re Honeywell, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of PruttonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  5. Application of Russell C. FlintCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API