People v. West
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
A defendant’s State constitutional right to counsel "indelibly attaches” upon actual representation in a criminal matter. *372The question before us on this appeal — where defendant’s right to counsel unquestionably attached by virtue of counsel’s representation of him in the matter at issue — is what indelible attachment means in those circumstances.
Defendant, along with twin brothers Michael and Mark Davenport, was part of a drug operation based in a house on West 116th Street in Manhattan. On February 15, 1982, a fight broke out in front of the house during…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. GriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.