Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 2011PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Graffeo, J.

Under New York’s indelible right to counsel rule, a defendant in custody in connection with a criminal matter for which he is represented by counsel may not be interrogated in the absence of his attorney with respect to that matter or an unrelated matter unless he waives the right to counsel in the presence of his attorney (see People v Rogers, 48 NY2d 167 [1979]). In this case, we must determine whether the rule applies even if the interrogator is unaware that an incarcerated defendant is represented by an attorney. We conclude that if it is reasonable for an…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. People v. PequeNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. DollNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. The People v. Pamela Hanson, The People v. Julian SilvaNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. LewieNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. KoonceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API