People v. Rogers
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Cooke.
We hold today that once an attorney has entered the proceeding, thereby signifying that the police should cease questioning, a defendant in custody may not be further interrogated in the absence of counsel. We may not blithely override the importance of the attorney’s entry by permitting interrogation of an accused with respect to matters which some may perceive to be unrelated.
Defendant was convicted, after jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and, upon plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. The evidence at trial in part consisted of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- People v. MaerlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by362 opinions
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. Yut Wai TomNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
357 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.