Legal Opinion

People v. Hobson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1976PublishedCited by 490 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Breitel.

Defendant, following denial of a motion to suppress his incriminating statements, was convicted, after a guilty plea, of third degree robbery (Penal Law, § 160.05). He was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment. His conviction was affirmed, and he appeals.

The issue is whether a defendant in custody, represented by a lawyer in connection with criminal charges under investigation, may validly, in the absence of the lawyer, waive his right to counsel.

There should be a reversal. Once a lawyer has entered a criminal proceeding representing a defendant in connection with…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by490 opinions

  1. People v. PequeNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

485 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API