Legal Opinion

People v. Ramos

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 22, 2002PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenblatt, J.

In People v Kinchen (60 NY2d 772, 773 [1983]), we held that “a claimed deprivation of the State constitutional right to counsel may be raised on appeal, notwithstanding that the issue was not preserved by having been specifically raised in a suppression motion or at trial.” On this appeal, defendant argues that an intentional delay of arraignment for the purpose of obtaining a confession gives rise to a valid State constitutional right to counsel claim which, under Hinchen, may be raised for the first time on appeal. We disagree, and conclude that defendant…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. People v. GriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. DollNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People v. WilhelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API