People v. Ramos
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rosenblatt, J.
In People v Kinchen (60 NY2d 772, 773 [1983]), we held that “a claimed deprivation of the State constitutional right to counsel may be raised on appeal, notwithstanding that the issue was not preserved by having been specifically raised in a suppression motion or at trial.” On this appeal, defendant argues that an intentional delay of arraignment for the purpose of obtaining a confession gives rise to a valid State constitutional right to counsel claim which, under Hinchen, may be raised for the first time on appeal. We disagree, and conclude that defendant…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- People v. GriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. McLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- The People v. Jin Cheng LinNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. DollNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. WilhelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.