Floeting v. Horowitz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Gustave E. Floeting,. from a judgment of the 'Municipal Court of ,the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn,, seventh district, in favor of the defendant, rendered on the 7th day of December, 1906. ■ "
1Opinion of the Court
Hooker, J.:
The plaintiff agreed to purchase of the defendant premises- “ Being known as Seventy-one Pineapple Street, in the Borough of Brooklyn, New York City, same having a frontage of Twenty-seven feet six inches on Pineapple Street, with a depth of about One hundred and one feet;” and upon the execution of the. contract paid $100 in cash toward the purchase price. At the time set for the completion of the purchase the defendant tendered a deed, in which the premises- were described as being twenty-seven feet one inch and one-half frontage on Pineapple street-. This description was the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Raben v. RisnikoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Harder v. AllredCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Brown v. AitkenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Von Bargen v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- McCrea v. HinksonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
- Vogt v. ShumateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.