Legal Opinion

Sandberg v. Margold Realty Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The variances in the dimensions of lots in The Bronx purchased by the plaintiffs from the defendant "have resulted in a judgment in this case giving back to the plaintiffs their $1,000 first payment on the purchase price.

The contract of sale described these vacant lots by reference to a map on which they were delineated and also by approximate measurements. The wording is:

“ Witnesseth, that the seller agrees to sell and com vey, and the purchasers agree to purchase all that certain plot, piece or parcel of land, situated, lying and being in the Borough of Bronx, County of Bronx, City and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. BaronNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Friedman v. BaronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  3. Von Bargen v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Von Bargen v. GinsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Springfield School District No. 186 v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  3. Springfield School District No. 186 v. Department of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  4. V.A. Tellis v. Briamar AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API