Legal Opinion
Handleman v. Pickerill
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1927No. Docket No. 4860PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLUCAS, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff, as sublessee, brought suit against the defendants for injunction from obstructing a show-window and for damages. Judgment was rendered for defendants, and plaintiff brings this appeal.
On October 21, 1919, the defendants Pickerill and Scott entered into a written lease with California Chocolate Shops, letting the ground or street floor of a building to be erected by the lessors. The lease contained the following language: “excepting from said ground floor sufficient space at the west end thereof for an entrance to the upstairs of said building, and to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Audubon Hotel Co. v. BraunnigSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Baranov v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Bailey v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Van Slyke v. Arrowhead Reservoir & Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Buttner v. KasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fifth & Broadway Partnership v. Kimny, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
- Farber v. GreenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Marchese v. Standard Realty & Dev. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bell Federal Credit UnionNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Higgins v. MoncktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.