City of Los Angeles v. Lelande
California Court of Appeal
PETITION for writ of mandate to the city clerk of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Petition for writ of mandate.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel respondent, as city clerk of the petitioning city, to certify to the passage of an ordinance by the common council of that city ordering certain street work (which includes the construction of sidewalks) under the Vrooman act. Respondent bases his refusal to do this upon the contention that the Vrooman act, in so far as it was applicable to the construction of sidewalks, was repealed by the “sidewalk act,” which was approved March 6, 1909 (Stats. 1909, p. 167), and took effect before the date of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People Ex Rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Alameda County v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Peters v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Corson v. ThomsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976