Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. Lyons
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to enforce a lien for street-work, claimed under the mechanic’s lien law. Plaintiff had judgment, from which defendants appeal, on bill of exceptions.
This is the second appeal of the case. In the first appeal the judgment for plaintiff was affirmed in Department (Santa Cruz Rock Pav. Co. v. Lyons, 43 Pac. Rep. 599); on rehearing in Bank, the judgment was reversed on the ground that section 1191 of the Code of Civil Procedure is unconstitutional, in so far as it attempts to impose a hen on land by virtue of an agreement on the part of one who is merely reputed to be the owner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mack v. JastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People Ex Rel. Board of State Harbor Commissioners v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- People ex rel. Warfield v. Sutter Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- McAllister v. HamlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Santa Cruz Rock Pavement Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Vallejo & Northern Railroad v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Matter of Petition of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Hammond v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Matter of Application of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.