Synnott v. Midway Hospital
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial in a medical malpractice action arising from a burn sustained by plaintiff Dorothy Synnott while in surgery. The issue is whether the negligent acts of an X-ray technician employed by defendant hospital, who utilized X-ray equipment and procedures prior to surgery, are to be imputed to the hospital as a matter of law. Defendant also contends that the trial court erred in permitting plaintiffs to call as an adverse witness under Rule 43.02, Rules of Civil Procedure, an employee of defendant…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Swigerd v. City of OrtonvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Saint Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. St. Joseph's HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Wallstedt v. Swedish HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- First State Bank of Ely v. SeliskarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sparger v. Worley Hospital, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1977
- Hestbeck v. Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. StaatSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Lhotka v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Kohoutek v. HafnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.