Legal Opinion

Kohoutek v. Hafner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 11, 1985No. C6-84-1274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying' a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial, in a medical malpractice action. Appellants Barbara and Kevin Kohoutek claimed battery, negligent nondisclosure and negligent treatment by respondent doctors and hospital as a result of brain damage sustained by their child, Nathan Kohoutek, in delivery. Battery was not submitted and the jury rejected both negligence claims. We reverse on the battery and negligent nondisclosure claims, affirm the finding of no negligent treatment, and remand the remaining…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Marston v. Minneapolis Clinic of Psychiatry & Neurology, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kohoutek v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Kohoutek v. HafnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API