Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Ely v. Seliskar

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1926No. 25,712PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Action to recover upon a promissory note given by the defendant to plaintiff for $3,500, payable in 6 months from date, with interest at 7 per cent per annum, on November 30, 1920.. In his amended answer defendant admits his signature upon the note and alleges that the same was obtained without his knowledge or consent, and that said note was obtained by plaintiff by fraud. The cause was tried to the court, without a jury, findings were made and judgment ordered for the full amount of the note with interest and costs. From an order denying his alternative motion for amended findings or a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. v. HeiplerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Synnott v. Midway HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Adams v. Farmers State Bank of OliviaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Timmins v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Hork v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Johnson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API