Legal Opinion
Peter Gabor Kalman v. The Berlyn Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 24, 1991No. 89-1371, 89-1378PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge.
In this patent infringement action, plaintiff, Dr. Peter Gabor Kalman, a British citizen and holder of a United States Patent on a filtering device, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts awarding him $735,228 in damages from defendant, The Berlyn Corporation.
Dr. Kalman contends that the district court erred in denying his motion, pursuant to Rules 15 and 21 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to amend his pleadings to add as a plaintiff Process Developments Ltd. (PDL), a British corporation of which Dr. Kalman is 50%…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Wms Gaming Inc. v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.