Legal Opinion
Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 3, 1991No. 91-1062PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Biodex Corporation (“Biodex”) appeals the judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California entered on a jury verdict that found U.S. Patent No. 4,691,694 (“694 patent”) invalid and U.S. Patent No. 4,628,910 (“910 patent”) not infringed by devices manufactured by defendants, Loredan Biomedical, Inc., and its chief executive, Malcolm Bond (collectively, “Loredan”). Biodex Corp. v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc., Civ-S-87-1132 (E.D.Ca. Oct. 2, 1990). We affirm.
I
Biodex is the assignee of both patents in suit which claim certain muscle exercise and…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Teleflex, Inc. v. Ficosa North America Corp., Fico Cables, S.A., and Ficosa North America S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Unitherm Food Systems, Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Vivid Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.