Legal Opinion
Gionfriddo v. Town of Windsor
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 22, 1951PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The stipulated facts determinative of the issue stated above are as follows: The plaintiff Michelina Gionfriddo is the owner of premises in a business zone in Windsor which are used by the plaintiff Orlando Gionfriddo, lessee, for the sale and display of used cars. The defendants are the town of Windsor and its zoning commission. Building zone regulations were adopted by the commission on July 3, 1931, pursuant to the authority of a special act. 21 Spec. Laws 275, No. 305. Under § 15(7) of the regulations, the board of zoning appeals may in a specific case, after public notice and hearing and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Amsel v. BrooksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- DeMaria v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Aunt Hack Ridge Estates, Inc. v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.