Legal Opinion
Holt v. Wissinger
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1958PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKihg, J.
The five individual defendants in the first case, hereinafter referred to as the Wissinger case, own a tract of land in West Hartford known as Brookside Knolls which they are engaged in developing for residential use. The corporate defendant, The Juno-Maskel Construction Company, is engaged, under a contract with the individual defend ants, in improving a roadway 60 feet wide and 185 feet long running from Brookside Knolls to Brook-side Boulevard. This boulevard, since 1917, has been a public street in West Hartford for a length of at least 1200 feet measured westerly from its intersection…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage EmployeesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Kamerman v. LeroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. PremoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.