Redman Homes, Inc. v. Employment Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
1. Employer seeks review of EAB’s award of unemployment benefits to claimant, who left work rather than submit to a drug test required by company policy. The issue is whether claimant voluntarily quit with good cause and is therefore entitled to benefits. ORS 657.176(2)(c); OAR 471-30-038(4). We affirm.
Largely in response to safety concerns, employer instituted a drug testing policy requiring employes to submit to drug tests after having on-the-job injuries. Claimant consented in writing to that policy on November 5, 1987. On November 10, 1987, claimant injured his back on the job, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McPherson v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Trebesch v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Veneer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Langer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Veneer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991